<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Listening Versus Understanding Your Customer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2010/03/listening-versus-understanding-your-customer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2010/03/listening-versus-understanding-your-customer/</link>
	<description>The Power of Many Little Voices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:02:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2010/03/listening-versus-understanding-your-customer/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/?p=431#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Thank you Valerie. I am glad you agree that listening to the customers is not enough and is a worthwhile endeavor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Valerie. I am glad you agree that listening to the customers is not enough and is a worthwhile endeavor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valerie Fielder</title>
		<link>http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2010/03/listening-versus-understanding-your-customer/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Valerie Fielder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/?p=431#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Gregory,
Interesting discussion.  It&#039;s true that we often get caught up in the technology rather than viewing CRM as a progression of activity. 

I don&#039;t see the reference to a definate causation, but a suggestion that a &quot;relationship&quot; probably does exist between Cust. Satisfaction &amp; Econ. Performance. I gathered from The Big Picture that the concept is valid and perhaps a connection has been proven.

Of course it doesn&#039;t happen in every situation and underlying variables will always be present in terms of performance AND stock price.  That is just a given.

Your overall message of closing the gap between listening and understanding our customers is commendable.
Regards,
Valerie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gregory,<br />
Interesting discussion.  It&#8217;s true that we often get caught up in the technology rather than viewing CRM as a progression of activity. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see the reference to a definate causation, but a suggestion that a &#8220;relationship&#8221; probably does exist between Cust. Satisfaction &amp; Econ. Performance. I gathered from The Big Picture that the concept is valid and perhaps a connection has been proven.</p>
<p>Of course it doesn&#8217;t happen in every situation and underlying variables will always be present in terms of performance AND stock price.  That is just a given.</p>
<p>Your overall message of closing the gap between listening and understanding our customers is commendable.<br />
Regards,<br />
Valerie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory (@piplzchoice)</title>
		<link>http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2010/03/listening-versus-understanding-your-customer/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory (@piplzchoice)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/?p=431#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Rags,

Thank you for your comment. You bring a valid point, however we do not fly planes or sail boats relying on just one instrument - making predictions of a company financial performance is far more complex and therefore requires a good number of reference points than most activities we usually deal with. In that context, the use of customer satisfaction trends to assess a company profit forecast risks, seem to me a very valuable approach. In fact I spoke to a number of financial securities analysts who use customer satisfaction data trends as one of predictive indicators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rags,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment. You bring a valid point, however we do not fly planes or sail boats relying on just one instrument &#8211; making predictions of a company financial performance is far more complex and therefore requires a good number of reference points than most activities we usually deal with. In that context, the use of customer satisfaction trends to assess a company profit forecast risks, seem to me a very valuable approach. In fact I spoke to a number of financial securities analysts who use customer satisfaction data trends as one of predictive indicators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rags Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2010/03/listening-versus-understanding-your-customer/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Rags Srinivasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/?p=431#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Greg
From the BigPicture blog you quote there is definite causation implication - which is slippery slope. The data reported is only correlation.The R-sqr change is 9% when they added ACSI, how can this be described very strong? The JD Power associates study is  firm level cross-sectional study not a customer level longitudinal study.

There is quite possibly omitted variable bias in both the studies quotes - there is another lurking variable (e.g., strategy, products, effective pricing, channels, quality, market etc) that drive both stock prices and the customer satisfaction. 

Even if we assume there is causation, investing based on customer satisfaction is a good investment strategy only if this information is not already reflected in the stock (in other words, high customer satisfaction gives new information that is not available through other indicators like earnings growth, accruals, cash flow etc).

Just some thoughts
-rags</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg<br />
From the BigPicture blog you quote there is definite causation implication &#8211; which is slippery slope. The data reported is only correlation.The R-sqr change is 9% when they added ACSI, how can this be described very strong? The JD Power associates study is  firm level cross-sectional study not a customer level longitudinal study.</p>
<p>There is quite possibly omitted variable bias in both the studies quotes &#8211; there is another lurking variable (e.g., strategy, products, effective pricing, channels, quality, market etc) that drive both stock prices and the customer satisfaction. </p>
<p>Even if we assume there is causation, investing based on customer satisfaction is a good investment strategy only if this information is not already reflected in the stock (in other words, high customer satisfaction gives new information that is not available through other indicators like earnings growth, accruals, cash flow etc).</p>
<p>Just some thoughts<br />
-rags</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

