<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Data to Wisdom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2009/10/from-data-to-wisdom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2009/10/from-data-to-wisdom/</link>
	<description>The Power of Many Little Voices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:55:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The CES2010 aftermath &#124; Amplified Analytics Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2009/10/from-data-to-wisdom/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>The CES2010 aftermath &#124; Amplified Analytics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piplzchoice.com/?p=131#comment-89</guid>
		<description>[...] need more examples of business processes where product managers have to &#8220;translate&#8221; data into &#8220;information&#8221; that suggest action. Consider the actions a marketing product manager can take based on the data [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] need more examples of business processes where product managers have to &#8220;translate&#8221; data into &#8220;information&#8221; that suggest action. Consider the actions a marketing product manager can take based on the data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotkapchen</title>
		<link>http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2009/10/from-data-to-wisdom/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotkapchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piplzchoice.com/?p=131#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Then the last thing is to persist it all (including the synthesis that others can&#039;t do -- it&#039;s not &#039;obvious&#039; to everyone), as I recommended: http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/07/31/the-context-of-intent/

Yes, some of the web analytics tools provide dashboards, but this is more of a corporate synthesis and &#039;reporting&#039; and collaborative discussion around it all: the cross-dashboard -- with teases to other details (perhaps you&#039;ve mentioned something similar that I&#039;ve missed).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then the last thing is to persist it all (including the synthesis that others can&#8217;t do &#8212; it&#8217;s not &#8216;obvious&#8217; to everyone), as I recommended: <a href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/07/31/the-context-of-intent/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/07/31/the-context-of-intent/</a></p>
<p>Yes, some of the web analytics tools provide dashboards, but this is more of a corporate synthesis and &#8216;reporting&#8217; and collaborative discussion around it all: the cross-dashboard &#8212; with teases to other details (perhaps you&#8217;ve mentioned something similar that I&#8217;ve missed).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2009/10/from-data-to-wisdom/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piplzchoice.com/?p=131#comment-65</guid>
		<description>I suppose the only meaningful approach to take is a &quot;filter&quot; approach. Monitor for signals, tune noise out and focus on reception from identifiable channels, organize/distill data into information (actionable), correlate information between the channels to create knowledge (actionable), deep analysis of multiple sets of knowledge to &quot;figure out&quot; the cause(s) (strategic action&quot;. Very similar approach to mining and refinement process. Is there more fun than to noodle things out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose the only meaningful approach to take is a &#8220;filter&#8221; approach. Monitor for signals, tune noise out and focus on reception from identifiable channels, organize/distill data into information (actionable), correlate information between the channels to create knowledge (actionable), deep analysis of multiple sets of knowledge to &#8220;figure out&#8221; the cause(s) (strategic action&#8221;. Very similar approach to mining and refinement process. Is there more fun than to noodle things out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotkapchen</title>
		<link>http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2009/10/from-data-to-wisdom/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotkapchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piplzchoice.com/?p=131#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Let me suggest a 3rd or a morph of 1 and 2. The bottom line is that except for businesses that really know ALL of their channels and have fairly static products/offerings, the KPIs for 2 must constantly be adjusted by 1.

The problem is that businesses believe that the KPIs actually &#039;tell&#039; them something meaningful. In many cases what they &#039;tell&#039; is neither meaningful or actionable -- just more of a &#039;yep, it changed, but we have no idea why or what we can do about it&#039;. If the latter, is it really worth the cost to follow/report?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me suggest a 3rd or a morph of 1 and 2. The bottom line is that except for businesses that really know ALL of their channels and have fairly static products/offerings, the KPIs for 2 must constantly be adjusted by 1.</p>
<p>The problem is that businesses believe that the KPIs actually &#8216;tell&#8217; them something meaningful. In many cases what they &#8216;tell&#8217; is neither meaningful or actionable &#8212; just more of a &#8216;yep, it changed, but we have no idea why or what we can do about it&#8217;. If the latter, is it really worth the cost to follow/report?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2009/10/from-data-to-wisdom/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piplzchoice.com/?p=131#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Sorry Paula, I just now discovered your comment. You are absolutely correct about the &quot;meaning&quot; of what we measure. There are two dominant approaches carrently in play: 
1. Pure Discovery - We do not know what we are looking for, but we&#039;ll see the patterns of knowledge when they emerge. I call it a serendipity approach - you are looking for the needle in a hay and find a farmer&#039;s daughter.
2. KPI Measurements - Let us measure these things and manage our enterprise performance based on it, even though they are not related to any specific actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Paula, I just now discovered your comment. You are absolutely correct about the &#8220;meaning&#8221; of what we measure. There are two dominant approaches carrently in play:<br />
1. Pure Discovery &#8211; We do not know what we are looking for, but we&#8217;ll see the patterns of knowledge when they emerge. I call it a serendipity approach &#8211; you are looking for the needle in a hay and find a farmer&#8217;s daughter.<br />
2. KPI Measurements &#8211; Let us measure these things and manage our enterprise performance based on it, even though they are not related to any specific actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention From Data to Wisdom &#124; Amplified Analytics Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2009/10/from-data-to-wisdom/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention From Data to Wisdom &#124; Amplified Analytics Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piplzchoice.com/?p=131#comment-54</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Uwe Hook, Kelly Craft. Kelly Craft said: Good read. RT @uwehook: From data to wisdom http://is.gd/55YSh [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Uwe Hook, Kelly Craft. Kelly Craft said: Good read. RT @uwehook: From data to wisdom <a href="http://is.gd/55YSh" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/55YSh</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotkapchen</title>
		<link>http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2009/10/from-data-to-wisdom/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotkapchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piplzchoice.com/?p=131#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Great piece. I haven&#039;t used the standard analytic tools for a couple years but the majority of the standard measures they present are not actionable.

Most particularly, as you&#039;ve noted here, starting with some of the standard data, they have to be combined and compared. It&#039;s all a matter of relativity. But there are no standards. Every company is different. The data has to be experimented with to uncover the relevant stuff.

I was once &#039;let go&#039; by a manager who didn&#039;t understand that this stuff isn&#039;t self-serving. He believed that you just set up the tools and they spit stuff out. He was interested in heartbeats, which tell you nothing until you&#039;re dead and the heartbeat stops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece. I haven&#8217;t used the standard analytic tools for a couple years but the majority of the standard measures they present are not actionable.</p>
<p>Most particularly, as you&#8217;ve noted here, starting with some of the standard data, they have to be combined and compared. It&#8217;s all a matter of relativity. But there are no standards. Every company is different. The data has to be experimented with to uncover the relevant stuff.</p>
<p>I was once &#8216;let go&#8217; by a manager who didn&#8217;t understand that this stuff isn&#8217;t self-serving. He believed that you just set up the tools and they spit stuff out. He was interested in heartbeats, which tell you nothing until you&#8217;re dead and the heartbeat stops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://blog.amplifiedanalytics.com/2009/10/from-data-to-wisdom/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piplzchoice.com/?p=131#comment-23</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by myankelovich: From Data to Wisdom - http://b2l.me/rgrb (via @piplzchoice)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by myankelovich: From Data to Wisdom &#8211; <a href="http://b2l.me/rgrb" rel="nofollow">http://b2l.me/rgrb</a> (via @piplzchoice)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
